Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 11:12

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Has a psychic ever made a crazy prediction that turned out to be true?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Switch 2 Tears Of The Kingdom Confirms Link Respects Women - Kotaku
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Presidential Message on National Men’s Health Week, 2025 - The White House (.gov)
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Meta in Talks for Scale AI Investment That Could Top $10 Billion - Bloomberg
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Fed interest rate decision looms as battle over cuts takes surprising turn - TheStreet
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro June 6, 2025 - NASA Watch